space
space
Peshtigo Times
space
space
space
Perspectives
* From our readers
space
space
Sports Shorts
* Three New Trails For Hikers, Bikers In Wisconsin
* Deer Advisory Councils Provide Opportunity For Local Input
* Ardent Fisherman Objects To Proposed Pan Fish Rules
* Cougars Off And Running
* Town of Peshtigo Fire Dept. Hosts Golf Outing Sept. 12

space
Peshtigo Fire
space
e-Edition
Now Available
For more information
click here
dot
THE CITY REBORN FROM THE ASHES OF AMERICA'S MOST DISASTROUS FOREST FIRE
space
dot
space

Most Speakers Oppose New Shoreland Zoning Restrictions

The third and final public hearing on proposed revisions to Marinette County’s Shoreland/Wetland Zoning Ordinance drew a standing room only crowd to the Peshtigo Town Hall Tuesday evening, Oct. 2. With a few notable exceptions, most of the speakers who voiced formal opinions were opposed to the ordinance in general, and particularly opposed to adopting the requirements for “impermeable surfaces” unless and until it becomes absolutely necessary.

The turnout of approximately 85 persons was not surprising in a town with more miles of developed shoreline than any other in Marinette County, particularly in view of frequent reminders from Town Chair Herman Pottratz and personal distribution of reminder notices to constituents by County Board Supervisor Don Pazynski.

Attendance was in sharp contrast to the scant turnout for a similar hearing in Dunbar on Sept. 17, and slightly more than a vocal crowd at the first hearing, which was held in June at Crivitz Village Hall.

Major objections raised at the Peshtigo hearing were to requirements for only 30 foot “viewing corridors” and “remediation” that most likely would involve planting trees, shrubs and ground cover to block views that many lakefront property owners have enjoyed for years.

No remediation would be required on properties where the owners do not want to change the “footprint” of their current structures and paved surfaces, regardless of the percentage of land used. But remediation plantings would be required of all property owners who want permission to make certain changes after the ordinance goes into effect. With remediation, they would be allowed to use up to 30 percent of the property they own for impermeable surfaces such as buildings, driveways, walkways, patios, etc. Without remediation, only 15 percent of the property can be covered with an impermeable surface.

There were concerns that leaving grass unmowed as required in some remediation plans would be unsightly, attract bugs and “critters,” and create fire hazards. Grassy lawns and beaches are clearly frowned on by rule makers at the state level.

Peshtigo Town Board at its August meeting had unanimously agreed to have a letter drafted to Marinette County Board and its Land Information Committee, as well as Wisconsin DNR and Gov. Scott Walker, opposing NR 115 and what they described as “its increased restrictions on shoreland/wetland property owners.” Pottratz at that meeting had urged Peshtigo residents to attend the Oct. 2 hearing, and said the state has put NR 115 enforcement on hold “because they know it’s too intrusive and needs to be changed.”

That opinion was supported by State Rep. John Nygren at Tuesday evening’s public hearing. He said after the hearing that NR 115 was approved by Gov. James Doyle and the previous administration in Madison and expressed confidence with Gov. Scott Walker appointee Cathy Stepp now heading the DNR, many of the bill’s restrictions will be softened before it goes into effect.

What the legislature has done so far, Nygren added, is postpone the effective date of the impermeable surface rules by two years (until Feb. 1, 2014) to give time to make some needed changes, and pass Act 170, which eases the restrictions on non-conforming structures and sub-standard lots within the shoreland/wetland zoning area. He suggested Marinette County should implement the changes made possible by Act 170, but hold off approving on the current impermeable surface rules, which he is confident will never go into effect in their present form.

During the hearing, Nygren said the changes being considered for the Marinette County ordinance were to comply with rule changes passed during the previous administration, “and I do not believe you will see this (NR115) implemented in its current form...There will be significant changes.” He added that Act 170, “is good for the property owner...it makes the rules more lenient.”

John LeFebvre, Marinette County Zoning Administrator and head of the county’s Land Information Department, has been working with his committee for approximately two years on changes he feels are necessary to bring the Marinette County Shoreland/Wetland ordinance into compliance with the new provisions of NR115, and has incorporated changes to allow the less stringent regulations permitted by AB170. He said until the Marinette County ordinance is changed he cannot issue permits based on the new state law, with which it conflicts, and because of that, Marinette County shoreland property owners are penalized.

Land Information Committee Chair Ted Sauve opened the hearing to the tune of additional chairs being moved in to accommodate the crowd. He introduced committee members: John Fendryk, who represents the Farm Service Agency, and County Board Supervisors Larry Nichols, Joe Policello, Alice Baumgarten, Robert Holley and Clancy Whiting, and expressed hope for “some spirited comments.” He got his wish. Written comments may also be sent to LeFebvre’s office at the courthouse, where full text of the proposed ordinance is on file.

Dignitaries present included Nygren and State Sen. Dave Hansen, as well as County Board Chair Vilas Schroeder and a number of supervisors, among them Pazynski and Russ Bauer, whose districts include parts of the Town of Peshtigo. State Rep. Jeff Mursau, who heads the Assembly’s Natural Resources Committee, had attended the Dunbar hearing.

LeFebvre began by saying he was still celebrating an anniversary of sorts. He had started his 28th year as a Marinette County employee on Tuesday, Sept. 18. He said he was sorry the room wasn’t quite large enough to comfortably accommodate everyone, but promised that nevertheless they would take as much time as necessary for everyone to have their say.

He began by explaining that NR115 requires all counties to adopt Shoreland/Wetland Zoning ordinances to enforce its provisions. The first such law was passed back in 1967, and it was updated in 1980 and again later. Efforts to change it again began about 10 years ago, but the proposed new DNR rules were set aside at that time because of objections raised at public hearings all across the state, which attracted the largest turnouts ever seen on Wisconsin issues.

LeFebvre said neither he nor any members of the Land Information Committee are in favor of the new impervious surface rules, but unless they are changed before the 2014 implementation date, the county will have to either be in a position to enforce them or face some stiff state penalties.

He said in September of 2007 Marinette County Board passed a motion informing the state of their opposition to the impervious surface rules. He said state legislators are well aware that he, the Land Information Committee, and the full County Board remain opposed to those rules, and explained that if the Marinette County ordinance changes are adopted as proposed, the provisions that apply to impervious surfaces will not go into effect until 2014... “or when required by the state, or perhaps never.”

He added that Rep. Mursau and his Natural Resources committee are looking at changing a number of provisions, but declared, “...as of right now, NR 115 exists.”

He defined an impervious surface as anything where 51 percent or more of water that falls on it runs off without being absorbed. This means roofs, gravel, blacktop and asphalt driveways, walks and patios, and sometimes decks, unless they are designed to let water drain through onto the ground below. Purpose of the new rules, as stated by the DNR, is to protect water quality, he said.

Unlike other Shoreland/Wetland Ordinance provisions, the impermeable surface regulations apply only within 300 feet from the high water mark, even for properties with lake frontage.

Under those rules, anything currently on properties within the 300 feet can stay there, but if impermeable surfaces cover more than 15 percent of the total lot area they can be maintained by they can never be expanded, and new buildings such as garages, storage sheds and boat landings can never be added unless “remediation “ is done. With remediation, up to 30 percent of the lot can be covered by roofs, pavements and other impermeable surfaces.

By other current rules, only 30 feet on any single lot can be opened as a “viewing corridor,” enabling property owners to enjoy their views of the water and beach/shoreline areas. The new rules, if the changes are adopted, will allow clear viewing areas up to 30 percent of the shoreline frontage, for example 60 feet with 200 feet of frontage.

Also, under existing rules, any structures 75 feet or less from the high water mark can stay where they are and be maintained, but they can never be expanded outside their existing footprint, which is “grandfathered” in. If the new Act 170 rules are enacted, additions can be added to the back or sides of the structures, provided the additions are 75 feet or more from the high water mark, and do not cause hard surfaces to cover more than the prescribed 15 percent of the lot area. The exception is that, with mitigation, 30 percent can be covered with impermeable surfaces.

“Mitigation” means replanting a buffer zone along the first 75 feet of shoreline with natural vegetation that includes trees, ground cover and mid level growth like ferns where there once had been mowed lawn. There is an exception to the 75 foot buffer rule to allow mowing and yard maintenance in the first 15 feet around structures.

The 15 percent, with no mitigation required, allows covering 4,500 square feet on a 100 by 300 foot lot. Between 4,500 and 9,000 square feet of roofs and other hard surfaces like pavement requires mitigation, but in no case can more than 30 percent be had surfaced.

The impermeable surface rules only apply to the first 300 feet from the lake shore, LeFebvre said, while other provisions of the Shorelands/Wetlands laws apply to everything 1,000 feet or less from the water for lake frontage.

If more than the 30 percent of surface is already covered and the owner wants to expand or add a structure, they will need to remove something else, for example part of a driveway, sidewalk or patio, and plant the unmowed shoreland buffer. Surfaces can be changed without mitigation, provided the total amount of impermeable surface is not changed.

The state law does allow other means of mitigation, but LeFebvre had said at other hearings that he does not propose including them because enforcement would be a nightmare.

Owners developing new properties cannot open a viewing corridor that exceeds the 30 foot maximum.

Mitigation plans must be filed with the Register of Deeds and remain with the property if and when it changes hands.

To questions from the audience, LeFebvre said owners will not be required to remove ornamental plantings like spruce trees and lilac bushes, but probably would no longer be allowed to mow around them.

Someone asked what could be more natural than grass, and LeFebvre replied his job was not there to defend the law, but to explain what it is.

In all cases, mitigation would require replacing any failed septic systems.

“If this is state law,” someone asked, “why isn’t someone here from the DNR or other state agencies to explain it? Why aren’t they holding the public hearings?”

LeFebvre said when the original NR115 rules came out 10 years ago the DNR held hearings all over the state, and they attracted over 10,000 public comments, “The greatest turnout of any law in state history...but that was 10 years ago.” He pointed out however, that there were some state legislators present.

To comments from Supervisor Bauer, LeFebvre said he wanted to get the impermeable surface rules in place now, to show people what it will be like when they go into effect. Anyone contemplating projects can consider doing them now, before the new restrictions apply. He said as long as they need to change some provisions of the law they felt it would be better and less expensive to do them all at once. He added that if the state again delays implementation, the county can do likewise.

“How can the state pass an ordinance for the whole state, when parts are so different?” asked one property owner, who said he has 125 feet of sand along his shoreline, and mainly wanted his property for the view. “I pay $300 a foot in property taxes for my shoreline,” he added. “Will I now have to pay taxes only on my 30 foot viewing corridor?” That remark drew loud applause.

John Kollross asked what it will cost the county to administer the new rules, and who will pay for it. The answer was property taxes and permit fees. LeFebvre said one of Marinette County’s main objections back in 2007 was the cost of administration.

Chuck Boyle said he owns a vacant parking lot in the City of Marinette, for which he pays $30 a year in property taxes and a $100 per year impervious surface fee. He was concerned the city or county will now have an excuse to tax him more for shoreline runoff. LeFebvre said cities come under different rules.

That led to a question as to why rural property owners are being asked to stringently control runoff, while cities all over the state run storm water directly into rivers, streams and lakes. LeFebvre suggested taking that question up with the state.

Asked how the mitigation requirement for planting trees and other vegetation applies to properties that in their natural condition were sand or meadow, LeFebvre said they will look at whatever was natural there.

There was discussion on how the ordinary high water mark is determined, and what that might do to the amount of property on the tax rolls.

A lady who said her property is on Lake Noquebay Outlet said she and her neighbors have always retained the natural forested buffer LeFebvre talked about, and now the trees are so big they are falling over into the water, blocking any attempts at navigation and ruining use of the stream. LeFebvre said removing trees that fall over into the water is allowed.

A person explained his property on Shore Drive is across the road from the Bay, but is bordered by a former drainage ditch that the state has now determined is a navigable waterway, and asked if they will now have to get rid of the grassy lawn there. LeFebvre said they might need to do some mitigation, but it could be as simple as not mowing.

There were comments that they were being asked to make their yards ugly, and again questions were raised as to whether property taxes would go down.

Jeff Walters asked if the 30 foot viewing corridor per property was actual, or if it might be less. He was told it is 30 percent of the lake frontage, so on a sub standard lot, it could be less than the 30 feet.

“We need to talk to the state,” declared Gordon Wickland. “I cannot imagine Mr. Nygren or Mr. Hansen voting for this!” He suggested they change the ordinance now to allow the new provisions of Act 170, but hold off on including the impervious surface rules.

Marty Wagner said he was glad to hear LeFebvre and the committee opposed the rules they were proposing. To enthusiastic applause he repeated the objection to the state’s “one size fits all” rules, and declared, “I didn’t buy my property 25 years ago to look through a 30 foot window!...This really infringes on my rights as a property owner!”

“I believe shoreline zoning should be canned,” agreed Steve DeWitt. “We’ve got too many rules and regulations and more taxes and fees than we can deal with now!”

There was a comment that there is still much research to be done, and many unanswered questions. At the Dunbar hearing, Rep. Mursau had mentioned new studies showing that in northern lakes and streams, excess nutrients in the water often comes from decaying leaves and other vegetation in exactly the type of natural areas being prescribed for remediation.

Wayne Gerondale asked why the county had put in “a whole flock of culverts” along Shore Drive that go to nothing but dead ends.

Mark Monnette, Town of Peshtigo Supervisor, said the new rules will affect more people than anyone imagines. He pointed out, as had a previous speaker, that about 20 years ago the state had decided that all drainage ditches dug years ago in the Town of Peshtigo had become navigable streams.

Another speaker mentioned the wildfires in California that had resulted from insistence on leaving things “natural” and unmaintained, and declared that allowing long grass and brush to grow unrestrained will result in “more forest fires, more bugs, more critters and more snakes” near homes.

Jack Cahill declared he and his neighbors on Shore Drive, “Would pretty much like to be left alone, with no more regulations.” He added he hadn’t said much good about the DNR for years but did appreciate their work in getting rid of the phragmites that had plagued the shoreline. But, he asked, “How can they justify spending $300,000 to get rid of the phragmites so we can enjoy our lake views, and then tell us we have to plant trees so we can’t see the water?”

Sauve pointed to Chuck Boyle, and said he deserves much of the credit for the phragmite control program.

Vickie Kollrath agreed with Cahill, “Just leave us alone....We’ll pay our taxes, but we’ve got too many regulations!”

Dr. Wendell Johnson, a retired UW professor, sympathized with those who wanted things to be left as they always were, but said new rules are needed. “Many things have changed in the past 100 years,” he declared. “Populations have increased, septic systems have failed...The things we do and the things our neighbors do affects others...One thing this law tries to do is rectify the problems we face with our properties..This isn’t the old days...We can’t turn back the clock, our population is increasing, and we have to deal with the problems that causes.”

One lady commented on a recent visit to a southern Wisconsin city where the lake is ringed with houses and concrete, and said she did not want her area to be like that.

Other speakers continued to oppose added regulations. “Our property values have already gone down on the Bay,” one declared. “We don’t need any more rules to make things worse!”

A few old timers recalled the days when fine sand beaches were enjoyed all along the Green Bay shore line in the City of Marinette and the Town of Peshtigo.

To more comments that the problems come from the state, Chuck Boyle said he had spoken with DNR Secretary Cathy Stepp, and she had promised him she would come to Marinette County for information exchange meetings whenever they invited her.

“Let’s be reasonable as we approach our future,” urged Supervisor Pazynski. “Anyone will abide by rules as long as they’re reasonable and judicious...But a lot of us bought shoreland property for the view, and now they’re limiting that view.” He suggested e-mailing state legislators, asking them to help protect shoreland property values and the rights of shoreland property owners.

LaVerne Gregor was one of the few who suggested some of the impermeable surface rules may be justified. She said people buy small lots and then want to fill the whole thing with buildings and pavement. She cited developments in West Bend that she would hate to see duplicated here.

“I feel we have more than enough restrictions, and some over restrictions,” declared Dick Omdahl. He found it ludicrous that property owners are not allowed to make improvements to a drainage ditch, and added, “I’d urge that we not install any more restrictions, now or in the future!”

Pazynski noted as the meeting adjourned that there has been erosion caused by natural runoff for years, and shorelines have always been changed by nature. “Are we now going to say that God is wrong too?” he asked.


Recent stories, opinions and photos

Issue Date Department Headline
08-27-2014Sports
Three New Trails For Hikers, Bikers In Wisconsin

08-27-2014Sports
Deer Advisory Councils Provide Opportunity For Local Input

08-27-2014Sports
Ardent Fisherman Objects To Proposed Pan Fish Rules

08-27-2014Sports
Cougars Off And Running

08-27-2014Perspectives
From our readers

08-27-2014Perspectives
Tales from the old-timer

08-27-2014Perspectives
Country Cousin

08-27-2014Obituaries
Elizabeth Warschkow

08-27-2014Obituaries
Coralie J. Rutke 

08-27-2014Obituaries
Theresa Pucel

08-27-2014Obituaries
Alice F. Mross

08-27-2014Obituaries
Susan P. Mittlestaedt

08-27-2014Obituaries
Robert P. Micoley

08-27-2014Obituaries
Mary Maske

08-27-2014Obituaries
Glenn D. Garvey

08-27-2014Obituaries
Michael J. Dobbins

08-27-2014Obituaries
Charles H. Dettman, Jr.

08-27-2014Obituaries
Lucille M. Charapata

08-27-2014Obituaries
Daniel Bugarsky

08-27-2014Obituaries
Bonnie J. Alswager

08-27-2014Obituaries
Loren C. Schwartz

08-27-2014Obituaries
Ethel M. Schwartz

08-27-2014News
Live Pro Wrestling in Suring Labor Day Weekend

08-27-2014News
Centennial Seeks Slogan, Vendors

08-27-2014News
Wausaukee Legion Picnic Sept. 13

08-27-2014News
Middle Inlet 141 Work Starts Sept. 2

08-27-2014Community - Wausaukee
Seek Crafters, Vendors for Wausaukee Festival

08-27-2014Community - Wausaukee
Registration for New Students

08-27-2014Community - Wausaukee
First Presbyterian Church Marks 125 Years Sept. 7

08-27-2014Community - Wausaukee
T/Wausaukee Is Updated On Garbage Pickup, Mobile Homes

08-27-2014Community - Crivitz
Old Toys Topic at Loomis Days

08-27-2014Community - Crivitz
LNRD Meets Aug. 30

08-27-2014Community - Crivitz
Crivitz VFW Auxiliary Announces Five Contests

08-27-2014Community - Crivitz
Crivitz School District Passes 2014-15 Budget

08-27-2014Community - Coleman
Senior Club to Meet Sept. 8

08-27-2014Community - Coleman
North Kickers To Give Dance Lessons

08-27-2014Community - Coleman
Coleman Village Board Sept. 2

08-27-2014Community - Coleman
Close Coleman Library for 2 Weeks for Repairs

08-27-2014Front Page
Epic Journey Ends For Old Diplomas

08-27-2014Front Page
Wastewater Treatment Plant Electric Bills Show Savings

08-27-2014Front Page
Crivitz School Gets $170,000 Sparsity Aid, Gives 2% Raise

08-27-2014Front Page
County Removes Squad Cars, BearCat From Borrowing List

08-27-2014Front Page
25,000 Attend Marinette County Fair Aug. 21-25

08-20-2014Sports
Town of Peshtigo Fire Dept. Hosts Golf Outing Sept. 12

08-20-2014Sports
Demeny Racing Has Trouble On Crandon’s Short Track

08-20-2014Sports
Crews Will Survey Stream For Lampreys

08-20-2014Sports
Bulldogs Look To Retain Top Spot In Loop; Coleman, Crivitz, Wausaukee Hope To Be In The Mix

08-20-2014Perspectives
Country Cousin

08-20-2014Perspectives
From our readers

08-20-2014Perspectives
Tales from the old-timer

08-20-2014News
Cedar River Bridge Walk Royalty Aug. 31

08-20-2014News
Dog Orientation Night Sept. 9

08-20-2014News
Area Students Get Honor Scholarships

08-20-2014News
Pichette Earns Honors

08-20-2014Obituaries
Gerald Wright

08-20-2014Obituaries
Dale L. Wright

08-20-2014Obituaries
Rev. Warren W. Worden

08-20-2014Obituaries
Craig Richlen

08-20-2014Obituaries
Joseph F. Steiner

08-20-2014Obituaries
Rand Lange

08-20-2014Obituaries
Peter C. Kaufman

08-20-2014Obituaries
Hattie Jarmolowicz

08-20-2014Obituaries
Jeffrey A. DesJarlais

08-20-2014Obituaries
Nicholas J. Berkebile

08-20-2014Obituaries
Marilyn R. Becker

08-20-2014Obituaries
Richard S. Zielski

08-20-2014Obituaries
Donald E. Schneider

08-20-2014Obituaries
June E. Peot

08-20-2014Obituaries
Madeline L. Milheiser

08-20-2014Obituaries
Audrey J. Hranach

08-20-2014Obituaries
Alice E. Bowman

08-20-2014Obituaries
Anne M. Apanasiewicz

08-20-2014Obituaries
Rita R. Adkins

08-20-2014Community - Wausaukee
Athelstane Awards County Bid For Perch Lake Road

08-20-2014Community - Wausaukee
Presbyterian Women Oct. 18 Fall Supper

08-20-2014Community - Wausaukee
Wausaukee Legion Picnic Sept. 13

08-20-2014Community - Crivitz
Crivitz Oktoberfest at Veterans Park Sept. 20

08-20-2014Community - Crivitz
Old Toys Topic at Loomis Days

08-20-2014Community - Crivitz
Legion Trap/22 Shoot Aug. 30

08-20-2014Community - Crivitz
Crivitz School Budget, Annual Meeting Aug. 26

08-20-2014Community - Coleman
20 Area Packer Fans at Hall of Fame Banquet

08-20-2014Community - Coleman
Brazeau Services Sweepstake Winners

08-20-2014Community - Coleman
CCBA Business Showcase Oct. 25

08-20-2014Community - Coleman
Coleman School Board Two Meetings Aug. 25

08-20-2014Front Page
St. Augustine Church Will Mark 125 Years on Sunday

08-20-2014Front Page
Grants Help Middle Inlet Redo 11 Roads

08-20-2014Front Page
Finance Committee Recommends $37,335,000 Borrowing Resolution

08-20-2014Front Page
Sheriff Again Warns of Scams

08-20-2014Front Page
Fun, Entertainment, Rides At County Fair Aug. 21-25

08-13-2014News
Seek Crafters For Fall Fair

08-13-2014News
KC Brat Fry at Lee’s Foods

08-13-2014News
Wagner Centennial Seeks Slogan, Vendors

08-13-2014Sports
Slate Waterfowl Season Guidelines

08-13-2014Sports
2014 Crossbow Deer Season Approved By Natural Resources Board

08-13-2014Sports
Race Like A Girl Night At UPIR

08-13-2014Sports
Redbirds Fight Their Way Through Two Tough Opponents To Claim Latest Wishigan Crown

08-13-2014Perspectives
Country Cousin

08-13-2014Perspectives
From our readers

08-13-2014Perspectives
Tales from the old-timer

08-13-2014Obituaries
Tracey Rae Vandeveer

08-13-2014Obituaries
Jeannette O. Peterson

08-13-2014Obituaries
Elerine T. Lampinen

08-13-2014Obituaries
Joan Kapitz

08-13-2014Obituaries
Todd E. Johnson

08-13-2014Obituaries
Arvilla Johnson

08-13-2014Obituaries
Phillip A. Giese

08-13-2014Obituaries
Michael J. Gardon

08-13-2014Obituaries
Lucille R. (Baumler) Beyer

08-13-2014Obituaries
Christopher J. Wold

08-13-2014Obituaries
Roy H. Willmann, Jr.

08-13-2014Obituaries
Ron G. Whiting

08-13-2014Obituaries
Mary A. Wenzel

08-13-2014Obituaries
William H. VonBlaskewicz

08-13-2014Obituaries
Philip K. Radtke, D.D.S.

08-13-2014Obituaries
Bonnie J. Peterson

08-13-2014Obituaries
Eugene Pawlowski

08-13-2014Obituaries
Alice Rouer

08-13-2014Obituaries
Kathleen B. Olson

08-13-2014Obituaries
Ernest J. Olivares

08-13-2014Obituaries
Orin E. Kirchner

08-13-2014Obituaries
Elaine M. Jorgensen

08-13-2014Obituaries
Sandra K. Jagielski

08-13-2014Obituaries
Alfred Edward Hoffman

08-13-2014Obituaries
Doris M. Gustafson

08-13-2014Obituaries
Albert D. Enderby

08-13-2014Obituaries
Phyllis M. Dixon

08-13-2014Obituaries
Edward J. DesJardin 

08-13-2014Obituaries
Patricia A. Cornejo

08-13-2014Obituaries
Donna M. Chaltry

08-13-2014Obituaries
Roger W. Carriveau

08-13-2014Obituaries
Robert Bartz

08-13-2014Obituaries
Harriet Angelich

08-13-2014Community - Crivitz
Ski Cats Perform Final Show Aug. 16

08-13-2014Community - Wausaukee
Operation Christmas Child Shoeboxes

08-13-2014Community - Wausaukee
Silver Cliff Fire, Rescue Big Fundraiser Winners

08-13-2014Community - Wausaukee
Wausaukee School Packets Available

08-13-2014Community - Crivitz
49 Golfers Take Part In Doug Kwiatkowski Memoria

08-13-2014Community - Crivitz
Town Asks County To Allow ATV Trail on Bit of County X

08-13-2014Community - Crivitz
Twin Bridge Ski Finale Aug. 16-17

08-13-2014Community - Coleman
Fall Fest Set at Coleman Legion

08-13-2014Community - Coleman
Alyssa Gasser Earns Pharm.D

08-13-2014Front Page
Law Enforcement Committee Requests Two More Deputies

08-13-2014Front Page
2 Area Men Were Also Candidates

08-13-2014Front Page
Burke vs Walker In Governor Race

08-13-2014Front Page
Lakari, Johns Resign Twin County Airport Positions, Judge Rules Anderson On

08-13-2014Front Page
Break Ground For Koehne New Dealership

08-06-2014Sports
Racquetball Lessons At Bond Center

08-06-2014Sports
Peshtigo Youth Football Sets Registration Dates

08-06-2014Sports
Seek Input On New Pipeline Proposal

08-06-2014Sports
Racing Returns To UPIR Track With Features And Accidents


space
Peshtigo Times
WEB Poll!
Do you think the Green Bay Packers will make it to the Super Bowl this season?
space Yes
No
Undecided
space
TO VOTE CLICK
YES, NO or UNDECIDED

Suggest a Question
space .
space
FRONT
space
.
space
CLASSIFIEDS
space
.
space
COMMUNITY
space
.
space
GUEST BOOK
space
.
space
NEWS
space
.
space
OBITS
space
.
space
PERSPECTIVES
space
.
space
SPORTS
space
.
space
SUBSCRIBE
space
.
space
.
space
PESHTIGO FIRE
space
.
space
CUSTOM PRINTING
space
.
space
TIMES' SAVER
space
.
space
Click for Peshtigo, Wisconsin Forecast
FORECAST
space
Quick...
News or Ad Search
Enter News key words.
Enter Ad key words.



Peshtigo Times
841 Maple St
PO Box 187
Peshtigo, WI 54157
Phone: 715-582-4541
Email:
News@
PeshtigoTimes.com

space
Fax: 715-582-4662
© 2000-2014
All right reserved
space
Powered by
WEB Media
Interactive
COMMUNITY
WEB sites